AI isn't just describing your destination. It's deciding who hears about it first.
TakeScout tracks recommendation visibility — not just brand visibility — across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity are already answering the questions travelers ask before they've picked a destination — "best weekend trip for families," "affordable food-focused getaway," "where should I go hiking without a car." The question that matters isn't whether AI knows your destination exists. It's whether AI puts you on that shortlist, or recommends somewhere else instead.
TakeScout tracks that second question — recommendation visibility, not just brand visibility — across 124 destinations, 109,756 questions, and 136,165 places, updated continuously.
Why this matters now, not eventually
This isn't a future scenario — it's already running across every destination TakeScout tracks. Every tracked destination is being described, ranked, and recommended by AI right now, with or without anyone at the destination watching it happen. The choice isn't whether AI talks about your destination. It's whether you know what it's saying.
What a destination's report actually shows you
- Composite score against the network average — not a number in isolation, but where you stand relative to every other tracked destination
- Category ownership — which specific traveler questions you win (food, family travel, budget trips, outdoor adventure) and which ones a competitor destination wins instead
- Where AI is getting its information — the actual sites AI cites when it talks about you, so you can see whether your own official content is part of the answer or whether the answer is built entirely from third-party sources
- Change over time — a single check tells you almost nothing; the report tracks whether your position is shifting, and in which direction
- Where AI might be wrong — places recommended in your destination's answers that are confirmed closed or relocated, which affects real travelers making real plans
See it for your own destination
The clearest way to understand this is to look at real data, not a description of it. Browse tracked destinations to see if yours is already covered — start with a comparable destination if not: New York City's report shows the full picture a tracked destination gets.
How it's measured
Every score is built from repeated, dated observations across the major AI assistants, not a one-time snapshot — see the full methodology for how scoring works, and how to measure AI visibility for a tourism destination for the framework, with live figures from our tracking.
Questions tourism marketers ask
How can a tourism board get its destination recommended by ChatGPT?
No one can guarantee that ChatGPT will recommend a destination.
What we can measure: ChatGPT recommended the city in 18% of 735 answers (130) to the regional and national questions that apply to the 60 cities we track, answers collected October 1 to October 14, 2026.
The cities it recommended most often were Québec City and New York City.
Common questions from destination marketers
- Is AI recommending competing destinations instead of ours?
- Which websites do AI assistants cite when recommending a destination?
- Which local hotels, restaurants and attractions does AI recommend?
- How accurate are AI travel recommendations?
Not tracked yet?
Suggest your destination and get notified once it's covered.